Thursday, February 11, 2016

More lies, accusations and ignorance brought to you by Olga and freinds

Tuesday, February 9, 2016


Things are going well for some and not so well for others



 This is a picture of an undelivered stack of the UCO Reporter. You may wonder why? So do we. So will their advertisers. Remember who is paying for this. You are! This is clearly a mark against the Management. UCO and The Reporter.

Undelivered stack of the UCO Reporter


3 comments:

  1. And even when it is delivered it remains abandoned until thrown out.
    ReplyDelete
  2. 255 copies left on ninth of month. After middle of month restock of CV distribution points (Fitness Ctr, Clubhouse, Med Build etc.), kiss that pile goodbye. We may have actually under ordered this month. I need to get over there and hide one bundle for archive.

    Donald
    ReplyDelete
  3. Where are the copies for Northampton R. We are still waiting for ours to be delivered. Is Joy Vestal intentionally leaving my building out because she doesn't like my politics?
    Pity those poor advertisers who do not get their money's worth.
    ReplyDelete




This was my answer to the lies on the other blog who think they know how things are run at the Reporter. I left there almost a year ago and am so tired of seeing the utter nonsense being spread by Olga and her friends. My suggestion to her would be to speak to her former spy and get info on how things run at the office of the Reporter before twisting it into her lies and making unsubstantiated accusations about Joy Vestal or any other person that works or worked in the Reporter. Just because you write some crap on the toilet paper you cALL THE MESSanger, does not mean you have a clue on how to run a paper. Stick to the toilet, it suits you much better


this is the answer I put on their blog, word for word. I put it here only because Olga has a habit of deleting anything I say on Gary's or should I say her blog.





What kind of drivel are you spouting now? That Joy Vestal has anything to do with your association not getting the Reporter? How many lies can you make up? If you are not getting your copy of the Reporter, the only one you need to speak with is your maintenance people. That's right, the paper is picked up by each associations maintenance company, i.e. Seacrest, Gallager, etc...
Your accusations are faceless lies. Grow up already. You are definitely what this Village does not need. Now or ever! Anyone that votes for you is a fool. Print this you self righteous egomanic.

3 comments:

  1. It's unbelievable what these malcontents say. Just because one of them snaps a picture of newspapers left on a skid, they blame Joy Vestal for Northampton R not getting papers! It's an example of "Post hoc ergo propter hoc," the fallacy we learned about in school: Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X.

    You and Donald, Bob, have pointed out what really goes on. Let me tell you, Joy has a bit more to do than tell the delivery people "Now be sure that so-and-so doesn't get a paper"! The mals are just as willfully ignorant of how the "Peyton" popped up in the removal-of-the-banner business, although they seem to be getting warmer. It's NOT what they accused Dave of, but I doubt they'd admit that even if they did find out the truth. I feel that the really hard-core malcontents don't care a whit about the truth. Anything goes with them. Look at Esther's posts. They start out almost invariably discussing some world situation--it could be anything. What's just about guaranteed (if you ever get through all the verbiage) is that her posts all END UP in the same place! It's like "All roads lead to Rome." All Esther blog posts lead to bashing Dave Israel!

    ReplyDelete
  2. You have been gone a year. Seems to me maybe they changed things. I see the Cam is involved in the delivery of the paper. That's new. What else has changed? And you are very angry, not good.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Come on Gary, Even if Don is the CAM and is involved in the distribution, do you really think he is going to deprive 23 other residents in a building because one is a jerk? I think not.
    And then to blame someone else for it, just because you don't like the person is just unforgivable.

    ReplyDelete

Feel free to say what you want, just try to be civil and sign your name. Say it, claim it, or I may delete it.