Are we in for it?... Time to prepare.
Wednesday, August 26, 2015
Monday, August 17, 2015
comments on some stuff.
As I read the totally idiotic comments or eulogy written for Ed Black, it occurs to me, that every time someone does something perceived as wrong in any way in UCO, this particular person always calls for the removal or resignation of the one that offends her. At that rate there would be none left to run UCO, but is that actually the objective of this person? Get everyone out, so she could become the ever self important person she perceives herself to be. There is a term for that. Narcissism.
I may not agree with everything Ed does, but I respect his commitment to the village and its residents. Should the malcontent faction ever manage to take over this village, they will immediately remove Ed and his expertise, then we can go back to 1973. Who knows, maybe they'll bring back the tram throughout the village again. Whoohoo! Oh, but that might mean going back to paying for rides around the village... And the only store you'd have access to is Publix. Like they don't overcharge the residents as it is.
The criticism of many of UCO's people and officers comes mainly from those that THINK they know, but actually haven't a clue. They call the Reporter a rag, but in fact the trash they write, is nothing but rehashed blog entries. They don't publish who writes their trash, because a third of it is liable and they could be personally sued.
They criticized renters that work for UCO and claim they sit on committees or run them, but have a renter as their editor of the bird dropping catcher they say they publish. They collect advertising fees but I wonder how they manage to sell anything as they obviously don't actually publish anything on paper, not that I have ever seen... If I advertised with them, I would demand my money back. They must tell the advertisers that they distribute throughout the village, when we know, that is a lie. I wonder what their advertisers would think if they knew?
I may not agree with everything Ed does, but I respect his commitment to the village and its residents. Should the malcontent faction ever manage to take over this village, they will immediately remove Ed and his expertise, then we can go back to 1973. Who knows, maybe they'll bring back the tram throughout the village again. Whoohoo! Oh, but that might mean going back to paying for rides around the village... And the only store you'd have access to is Publix. Like they don't overcharge the residents as it is.
The criticism of many of UCO's people and officers comes mainly from those that THINK they know, but actually haven't a clue. They call the Reporter a rag, but in fact the trash they write, is nothing but rehashed blog entries. They don't publish who writes their trash, because a third of it is liable and they could be personally sued.
They criticized renters that work for UCO and claim they sit on committees or run them, but have a renter as their editor of the bird dropping catcher they say they publish. They collect advertising fees but I wonder how they manage to sell anything as they obviously don't actually publish anything on paper, not that I have ever seen... If I advertised with them, I would demand my money back. They must tell the advertisers that they distribute throughout the village, when we know, that is a lie. I wonder what their advertisers would think if they knew?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)